Skip to content

Your Download Will Begin in a Few Seconds …

Recently I read an article explaining how digital subscriptions are here to stay and at some point in the future we will all have one digital subscription or another. I don’t doubt the author’s premise, in fact I myself have and like several digital subscriptions which I find to be convenient,1 environmentally friendly,2 and content abundant. However, one area that I hope will get better is the payment management systems for digital subscriptions. Unlike traditional subscriptions were you would normal order for a set amount of time and be billed by the provider according to that time3 many digital subscription get your credit card information with the initial order and keep it. The problem that I have run into with this is digital content providers have automatically renewed my subscriptions without me knowing.

For instance, last October or November I signed up for NFL.com’s GAMEPASS monthly Regular Season subscription. Originally, I just wanted to try it out for a month and erroneously thought that because the name of the subscription included the term “MONTHLY” to continue service, I would have to renew it each month. After viewing for a few weeks I decided that I did not want to continue and made no other attempt to “re-up.” Several months later, I was reviewing my credit card statement and saw an $85 charge from the NFL for December, January and February. Not understanding why I was being charged for a service that I did not renew I contacted their customer service. Their response was: (1) that that the subscription “automatically renewed” until you actively told them you wanted it stopped, (2) refunds are available with they are informed within a few weeks of the charge in question and (3) even though the regular season was over as of the first week of January you were still being charged for the service because you could use it to watch or re-watch games already played. What that meant in reality was that this multi-million dollar organization was not going to refund me the almost $400 that they got from me. All that I have left to do is suck it up, write this blog post and recommend that anyone considering subscribing to GAMEPASS think twice and read the fine print.

Similarly, I have been a long time member of the New York Times’ online subscription. When they decided to put up a pay wall, based on my history as a member they offered me about a six month’s access for free. As that initial period was ending around January, they offered me another deal: $0.99 for full service till the end of March. I took the offer and used my credit card to pay the $0.99. About the same time that I noticed how the NFL was billing me for services I did not want I also noticed that I had been billed $35 twice by the NY Times. Confused, I went into my account to see how this could be and what I found is that even though I had the discounted service till the end of March, I was also being billed at the regular price for January and February.4 I tried to remove my credit card from the system to cut off any further charges but found that I could not do that on my own but had to contact NY Times Digital in order to stop service. I contacted them but they had absolutely no answer as to why I was granted the discounted service but yet also being charged the regular price. Frustrated I just decided to end completely my subscription. Like to NFL … no refund from one of the biggest papers in the nation.

So, back to my original point … while digital subscriptions may be here to stay … we all need to rethink how we manage them because at least in terms of how we pay for them, they are nothing like traditional media.

  1. accesible anywhere, anytime and on any device []
  2. no stacks of magazines or newspapers to recycle []
  3. yearly, monthly, weekly []
  4. the $35 charges I saw on my credit card statement []

In Defense of Blogging

It’s been awhile … so long that I almost forgot my password for posting to this blog. In the interim, I’ve often thought about what the use is for continuing this blog … and my reasons for not continuing are myriad such as: no one reads it; it takes time (and money) to keep it up and most pertinent … there are other more “cool” forms of social media that do the job as good if not better. But within the last two weeks I came across to article that pushed me back (ever so slightly) into the continuing. The first article (see here) touches on what I think many old-school bloggers have run up against, namely Web 2.0 applications such as Twiiter, Facebook, G+ that have for all intents and purposes removed the need for keeping a blog. But what the author stresses (and I agree with) is that all those new fangled apps basically produce content for companies that don’t give a f*** about you except that they need you to continue to create content for them and data that they use (or sell) for their own purposes. While we (most of the blogger nation whose sites attract little attention) cannot abandon those newer manifestations of social interactivity, we shouldn’t give in totally. Indeed, we should continue to create our own content, controllable completely to us and use the TwitBook+s of the world to funnel traffic back to our sites. This gives us control. This gives us independence. This ensures that we continue to have a stake in a free, open and continuously developing Internet (as opposed to closed world of Android and Apple as described here.) The second article was by a fellow blogger who was contemplating the benefits of blogging vs. Web 2.0 social media. In the end he decided (and again I agree) that the advantages of blogging included time to reflect, time to summarize and the chance to have deeper conversation with other. These were exactly the points I had hopes to attain when starting this blog so many years ago and that I hope I can rekindle again by posting more often to this space. In the end, this blog is all about me and thinking through some of the multitude of data that I am bombarded with daily. Perhaps more posting will focus my mind so that when I do tweet, I’ll actually know what I am talking about.

Make Mine Marvel?

Of course these court battles are about money. They also force the modern entertainment industry to reckon with the often amoral practices of the old comics workshops. And they raise deeper questions about how to credit creative works produced at a time when even the most talented artists were treated as serfs.

When I was a kid … comics was my life. If I wasn’t reading them, I was buying them, thinking about them or discussing them with my friends and fellow comic collectors. As I’ve gotten older while the comic addition has abated I still find myself interested in the stories and characters that fascinated me when I was a kid including the occasionally purchase of a interesting title. But as I’ve gotten older I’ve also learned about the inner workings of the company’s that so held sway over me1 and its that knowledge that has kept me from more intensely reconnecting with the stories and characters that fascinated me so much when I was a kid. A couple of issues I have is that (1) comics nowadays seem a bit overpriced and focused mainly on the art (which is important) rather than on the story (which is most important). (2) While a couple of the book-to-film productions have been good2 most have sucked and been focused on the more one-dimensional/boring characters of the super-hero universe (read: Thor and Captain America). Now I come across this story of the old comic houses stingily holding back on giving up some of the millions of dollars to the heirs of the artists that they manipulated and cheated out of their own creations.

Marvel Superheroes and the Fathers of Invention

  1. Marvel and DC mainly []
  2. Iron Man 1, Batman: Dark Knight []

Good Guys

[h]e fulminated against the complacent, lazy and otherwise obstructive practices of the N.G.O. world: at the preciousness of groups like Médecins Sans Frontières, which refuse on principle to work with the military, “even though the military is the single most effective organization that’s been here to date!”; at the pompous blustering in aid-group cluster meetings, “where everyone’s trying to show how much they know, but no one’s just reporting their actions, their problems and, you know, figuring out who can help”; at the feebleness of charities that drop out of tough camp management work on the grounds that camps are not “sustainable” projects. “Sustainability! It’s the ultimate cliché — and the ultimate excuse for N.G.O.’s that just want to move on to the next trendy, fundable job.”

If you ever worked in an international non-governmental organization, you’d appreciate Penn’s frankness and that some of his ideas ring absolutely true.

The Accidental Activist

“To the Cloud”

Today, RealNetworks announced Unifi, a multimedia-centric cloud service that aggregates your photos, music, and video files from across multiple devices and online services. In other words, instead of having to keep track of multiple media libraries, you get a single online interface for organizing and accessing your content. Better yet, there are no restrictions on the type of content or its location, so the service will pull from absolutely any library and any device.

As a hyper-mobile professional, I’ve been looking for safe, secure and convenient off-shore storage since calling something cloud meant the fuzzy white stuff on the sky. I have tried a variety of services such as Netdocuments (circa 1999), now defunct-Ekno (for e-mail and photos), soon to be shuttered Deli.ic.ious (for bookmarks) and most recently Dropbox (for everything). Dropbox has set the standard but sometimes it takes forever to acesss large files like videos or music. Naturally, I was intrigued by RealNetworks announcement of Unifi. I sounds like everything that I need. especially in allowing access from a variety of devices, allowing uploads from a variety of devices and finally providing a user-friendly UI to view/enjoy your content Will have to check it out. More hopefully later on this.

CES: RealNetworks Attempts to Unifi the Cloud

A Global Village

With aid, trade, green technology and peace its fully possible that everyone can make it to the healthy and wealthy corner.

A great lesson on the benefits of an increasing international cooperation and globalization.

With Chrome OS “Always Online” is a Snap

A while back I blogged about how I was considering making the next computer I purchase one operating on Chrome OS. But as Google offered little more than a few whispers here and there … I was beginning to wonder if Chrome OS was just another vaporware candidate. Accordingly, I was quite excited to hear, of Google’s announcement last Tuesday that it will be distributing a Chrome OS laptap for beta review. From the explanation given on the Chrome OS and via sundry reviews around the web, the laptop and OS is looking to be better than I thought. While I do have privacy and security concerns about succumbing totally to “the cloud” (read: look what happened to Wikileaks) it seems with enough diligence one could craft a formidable albeit imperfect protective practice. On the other hand, for a person that truly does live on the web, as I blooged before, it seems life the perfect hardware/software for me. Naturally, I signed up for Google’s Pilot Program but even if I’m not chosen … I’ll still be one of the first in line for the “to market” version.

The Streaming Singularity

I love movies and TV but the problem is living abroad tends to limit my accessibility to both. Now the last time I was in the US, a couple of movie and TV streaming services1 came out that seemed like great ideas at the time2 but due to bandwidth problems in the US and limits on access to them from abroad, they quickly fell into disuse and rarely clicked links on my sidebar. But now a confluence of events has made them (all three) the hub of my entertainment experience. First, the advancement of VPN software technology has allowed me to “appear” to be in the US when I am in reality elsewhere. This resolves my obstacle if gaining access to the above-mentioned sites. Second, all sites have seemingly upgraded their bandwidth/delivery methods which lessens the stuttering so common in streaming video. Finally, each has added a ton of content that which taken separately is alright but taken together as one big Hu-Fan-Flix megasite satisfies almost any video need I have. Indeed, with a total payout for the the pay services for HuluPlus and Netflix Instant with the free offerings from Fancast3 of under $25, I am seriously considering keeping this set-up rather than subscribe to cable when I eventually move back to the US. For now however, after years of slim-pickins in the desert of traditional movie/TV platform options, it,s great to swim in the oasis of online streaming media.

  1. Hulu, Fancast and Netflix []
  2. and I was among the early adapters of each []
  3. as well as the ton of independent content from such sites as Youtube and blip.tv []

Your Fired in 140 Characters

In an statement, Nasr called her own remarks “simplistic,” saying she’s learned a “good lesson on why 140 characters should not be used to comment on controversial or sensitive issues, especially those dealing with the Middle East.”

If you’ve ever doubted the growing importance of social media and the influence it is having on and in society, this story should give your pause.

Octavia Nasr Leaving CNN After Controversial Hezbollah Tweet

UPDATE: Here’s another story about how sometimes social media and work just don’t mix.

Moulitsas is a prominent and influential liberal blogger and a regular on MSNBC’s popular “Countdown with Keith Olbermann,” but it looks like Olbermann will no longer be allowed to have Kos on his show, because of this Twitter fight.

Everyone at MSNBC is such a baby

One man’s social media is another …

This is a bit dated but interesting perspective on “social media and the law” from Mark Cuban’s brother and attorney Brian Cuban.

Viewpoint: “New Laws of Social Media”